Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home donate | Forums | FAQs | Contributions | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright | Contact | Volunteer Positions | Jobs | Bios
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: larus Date: September 06, 2012 04:20:10am
Forum: feature_films Subject: Re: The Secret Life Of Walter Mitty (1947)

The meanings of abbreviations and symbols are listed on page ix of the 1974 Catalog of Copyright Entries:

(PCB) proprietor of copyright in a work copyrighted by a corporate body otherwise than as assignee or licensee of the individual author

(PCW) proprietor of copyright in a composite work

(PPW) proprietor of copyright in a posthumous work

(PWH) proprietor of copyright of a work made for hire


Here are definitions from the Copyright Compendium II
1310.03:
Generally, a composite work is an original publication relating to a variety of subjects to which a number of
different authors have contributed distinguishable and separable selections.

1317.04(a) Definition. Generally, a composite work is an original publication relating to a variety of subjects to which a number of different authors have contributed dis­tinguishable and separable selections. Thus, a work by a single author con­sisting of a collection of his writings is not a composite work. Similarly, a work which is the product of joint authorship and common design, or which consists of elements which have been indistinguishably merged into a single entity, cannot be regarded as composite: musical compositions, dramas, dramatico-musical works, and motion pictures.


I've seen MGM file two renewals (one as PCW and one as PWH) for a number of their films. The definition above seems incompatible with PCW status, but MGM could afford the best copyright attorneys money could buy, so they must have had their reasons.

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)